Current:Home > BackThe US is against a plan set for 2024 to retrieve items from the Titanic wreckage-LoTradeCoin
The US is against a plan set for 2024 to retrieve items from the Titanic wreckage
View Date:2024-12-23 22:27:16
The U.S. is taking decisive action to prevent the planned expedition to recover artifacts from the Titanic wreckage next year, firmly asserting the ship's designation as a revered burial site under federal law and international agreement.
RMS Titanic Inc. is the leading firm with exclusive salvage rights to the Titanic wreck. The company has confidently organized an uncrewed expedition to capture detailed photos of the ship and explore its hull.
According to the Associated Press, the government is facing a legal challenge unrelated to the Titan submersible incident in June. The submersible imploded near a sunken ocean liner, resulting in five individuals' deaths. However, this ongoing legal battle is centered around a different company and vessel with an unusual design. It's important to note that these two incidents are not connected.
The U.S. District Court in Norfolk, Virginia is currently overseeing the legal battle for Titanic salvage.
The government has stated that RMST's plan to enter the ship's severed hull would violate a federal law and a pact with Great Britain. According to the government, the sunken ship should be treated as a memorial to the more than 1,500 people who died when the Titanic crashed into an iceberg and sank while crossing the Atlantic in 1912.
The government is worried about damage to artifacts and human remains on the ship.
"RMST is not free to disregard this validly enacted federal law, yet that is its stated intent," U.S. lawyers argued in court documents filed Friday. They added that the shipwreck "will be deprived of the protections Congress granted it."
RMST plans to capture images of the entire wreck during their tentative May 2024 expedition. RMST said in a court filing the mission would recover artifacts from the debris field and "may recover free-standing objects inside the wreck."
RMST would "work collaboratively" with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. agency representing the public's interest in the wreck, but won't seek a permit.
U.S. government lawyers argued that RMST needs approval from the secretary of commerce overseeing NOAA before proceeding with the project.
RMST previously challenged the constitutionality of the U.S. attempting to interfere with its salvage rights to a wreck in international waters.
The firm argues that only the Norfolk court has jurisdiction, citing centuries of maritime precedent.
Where is the Titanic wreckage?Here's where the ship is located and how deep it is.
The Government vs. RMST 2020 incident
In 2020, RMST planned a mission to retrieve a radio from a shipwreck, which led to a legal dispute with the government.
The original plan was for an unmanned submersible to enter through a window or onto the ship's roof. A "suction dredge" would then remove loose silt while manipulator arms cut electrical cords.
The company made it clear they would exhibit the radio, accompanied by the heroic stories of the men who bravely sent out distress calls until the seawater was practically at their feet.
The district judge emphatically granted RMST permission in May 2020, emphasizing that the radio holds immense historical and cultural significance, and any further decay could lead to its irrevocable loss.
Weeks after the planned 2020 expedition, the US government legally challenged the firm which postponed its plans in early 2021 due to the pandemic.
veryGood! (3)
Related
- 'I know how to do math': New Red Lobster CEO says endless shrimp deal is not coming back
- Appeals court upholds retired NYPD officer’s 10-year prison sentence for Capitol riot attack
- Cicada map 2024: See where to find Broods XIII and XIX; latest info on emergence
- Melinda French Gates to donate $1B over next 2 years in support of women’s rights
- Drone footage captures scope of damage, destruction from deadly Louisville explosion
- Royal Family Quietly Removes Prince Harry’s 2016 Statement Confirming Meghan Markle Romance From Website
- A Kentucky family is left homeless for a second time by a tornado that hit the same location
- Jan. 6 officers to campaign for Biden in battleground states
- Record-setting dry conditions threaten more US wildfires, drinking water supplies
- As federal parent PLUS loan interest rate soars, why it may be time to go private
Ranking
- Chris Wallace will leave CNN 3 years after defecting from 'Fox News Sunday'
- Storm-weary Texas battered again as powerful storm, strong winds kill 1, cause widespread damage
- Louisiana authorities search for 2 escaped jail inmates
- What is Manhattanhenge and when can you see it?
- Justice Department sues to block UnitedHealth Group’s $3.3 billion purchase of Amedisys
- 7 people hospitalized, 1 unaccounted for after building explosion in Youngstown, Ohio
- Former California water official pleads guilty to conspiring to steal water from irrigation canal
- Dance Moms' Kelly Hyland Reveals Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Recommendation
-
Will Trump’s hush money conviction stand? A judge will rule on the president-elect’s immunity claim
-
Ja’Marr Chase, Tee Higgins absent as Cincinnati Bengals begin organized team activities
-
Nissan warns owners of older vehicles not to drive them due to risk of exploding air bag inflators
-
Mary-Kate Olsen Steps Out With Retired Hockey Player Sean Avery in Hamptons
-
New Yorkers vent their feelings over the election and the Knicks via subway tunnel sticky notes
-
AJ McLean Reveals Taylor Swift’s Sweet Encounter With His Daughter
-
Who will win Rangers vs. Panthers Game 4? Stanley Cup Playoffs predictions, odds
-
North Korea says attempt to put another spy satellite into orbit fails, ends in mid-air explosion